Quantum Theory vs Macroscopic Realism
Quantum theory allows for an object to be in two different states at the same time. This is described as a super position state, which combines different observable states. But could this really be true? Or could the particle be in a very specific state, at a very specific location and we just can’t observe it?
The behavior of quantum objects has been discussed using a very simple classical theory. In 1985, the “Leggett-Garg Inequality” was first introduced as a way to measure quantum behavior. It states, in effect, any theory that describes particle behavior without the superposition states in quantum theory must obey the Leggett-Garg inequality.
The inequality is fulfilled by all macrorealistic physical theories.
macroscopic realism is a classical world view defined by the joining of these two hypotheses.
- "A macroscopic object, which has available to it two or more macroscopically distinct states, is at any given time in a definite one of those states."
- Noninvasive measurability: "It is possible in principle to determine which of these states the system is in without any effect on the state itself, or on the subsequent system dynamics." Wikipedia.
For the first time, researchers at TU Wien are testing measurements with neutrons. Under observation, the Leggett-Gary inequality is violated and classical explanations and theories are not possible- only quantum theory fits! These findings were recently published in Physical Review Letters.
Quantum theory violates macroscopic realism. If different sites are attainable for a quantum particle, like different positions, speed or energy, then all combinations of the states is also possible. As long as the state is not measured. (During measurements, all super positioning is lost and destroyed.) The measurement forces each particle to make a decision in favor of one of the possible values.
The rules of quantum theory should apply to everything. Large things are made up of smaller quantum particles. So is it attainable to observe large objects with what we know about macroscopic realism? In 1985, macroscopic reality was tested with this Leggett-Garg inequality.
Elisabeth Kreuzgeuber is the author of the current research and states, “the idea behind it is similar to the more famous Bell’s inequality, for which the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded in 2022. . . However, Bell’s inequality is about the question of how strong the behavior of a particle is … The Leggett-Gary inequality is only about one simple object and asks the question: how it’s state at specific points in time related to the state of the same object at other specific points in time?”
Leggett-Garg figured an object measured three times should show completely different results each time. Even if nothing is known about whether or how the object’s states changes over time, statistics will point strongly to how different points in time correlate with each other.
Assuming microscopic realism Is correct, it can be shown mathematically - the strength of these relationships can never exceed a certain level.
Leggett and Garg theorized an inequality must always be true to the macroscopic realism theory, regardless of details.
If an object sticks to the rules of quantum theory, there must be stronger correlation between the measurements at three different points in time.And
If An object is in different states of the same measurement, this must lead the stronger relationship relationships between the three measurements.
Researcher Richard Wagner explains, “ If we want to test microscopic realism, then we need an object that is microscopic in a certain sense i.e. it has a Size comparable to the size of our every day objects.” It must be an object that has a chance of showing these unique quantum properties.
The experiment was conducted at the Institut Lave-Langevin by researcher Hartmut Lemmel. He states “ Neutron beams as we use them in a neutron interferometer are Perfect for measuring quantum behavior. The neutron beam is actually split into two parallel beams. . .”
Using complex measurements of the neutron, the team at TU Wien Tested the Leggett-Garg inexpensive theory. The results showed the inequality is violated.
The neutrons act in a way that cannot be explained using macroscopic realism theory. Neutrons travel on two separate paths at the same time and they are located at two different places, just centimeters apart.
One researcher Stephan Sponar surmises, “Our Experiment shows: Nature really is as strange as quantum theory claims… No matter which classical macroscopic theory you come up with, It will never be able to explain reality. It just doesn’t work with quantum physics.”
Hugs,
Krissy

Comments
Post a Comment